As soon as the esthetic wants to have something to do with it, this concept becomes dialectical like fortune and misfortune, whereby everything is confused.
^ "Engineers Assured Lock Plan Will Fail – H.G. Granger Attacks President's Board and the Report in Favor of Lock Canal – Schwab Wants a Sea Level – Tells Institute of Mining Engineers the Lock Type Is Inferior, and Business World Wants the Best" (PDF).
A further ambiguity with yes–no questions, in addition to that of polarity, is the ambiguity of whether an exclusive or inclusive disjunction is meant by the word "or", as it can represent either.
Let us mock God outright, this is always preferable to the debilitating importance with which one wants to demonstrate the existence of God.
Do away with itself, the spirit cannot; lay hold of itself, it cannot, as long as it has itself outside itself.
On the other hand, it is not the nature of its movement to raise actuality up into ideality.
"Ethics and dogmatics struggle over reconciliation in a border area fraught with fate.
Thus ethics develops a contradiction, inasmuch as it makes clear both the difficulty and the impossibility.
At the same time, the NYCDOT increased the frequency of maintenance inspections for the bridge, after inspectors found holes in beams that had been deemed structurally sound during previous inspections.
In other words, does Christianity say to first teach about "the works of the flesh" (the negative) or about the "Fruit of the Holy Spirit" (the positive)?